UCP 600 Article 38: Transferable Credits
Introduction
The illusion is that "assignable," "divisible," or "transmissible" in Field 40A will compile as a transferable credit, and that the nominated bank must then transfer on demand. Neither is true. UCP 600 Article 38(b) defines a transferable credit as one that specifically states it is "transferable." Article 38(a) then truncates the bank: it is under no obligation to transfer except to the extent and in the manner expressly consented to by that bank.
The failure mode is treating Article 38 as a pass-through and Article 39 as the same act. Article 39 is assignment of proceeds only. It does not transfer the right to perform. Mixing them mutates a middleman structure into a drawing the issuing bank never undertook.
Failure Mode Analysis
Failure mode 1: Compiling "assignable" as "transferable"
Article 38(b) is specific. "Assignable," "divisible," "transmissible," or "may be transferred" does not make a transferable credit. A nominated bank that effects a transfer anyway violates 38(a)–(b). The issuing bank never undertook that second-beneficiary drawing.
Failure mode 2: Increasing amount, expiry, or shipment date on transfer
Article 38(g) permits reduction or curtailment of amount, unit price, expiry, presentation period, and latest shipment date. It does not permit an increase. Insurance percentage may be increased only to meet the cover the original credit required. Expanding the credit on transfer is a binary reject at the issuing bank.
Failure mode 3: Missing substitution on first demand, or treating Article 39 as Article 38
If the first beneficiary must substitute invoice and draft and fails on first demand, or substitutes a discrepant invoice it will not correct, Article 38(i) lets the transferring bank send the second beneficiary's documents to the issuing bank with no further responsibility to the first beneficiary. The margin is gone. Assignment of proceeds under Article 39 does not restore a transfer that never compiled.
Deterministic Resolution Architecture
- Isolate Field 40A / the credit text: the word must be "transferable." Anything else truncates Article 38.
- Obtain the transferring bank's express consent (Article 38(a)). Do not assume a nominated bank must transfer.
- State, in the transfer request, how amendments will be advised to the second beneficiary (Article 38(e)).
- Mirror the original terms except the reductions 38(g) allows. Do not increase amount or dates.
- If substituting, have invoice and draft ready. First demand under 38(i) is not a negotiation.
- Second-beneficiary presentation is to the transferring bank (Article 38(k)).
- Do not recast a failed transfer as Article 39. Proceeds assignment does not transfer performance.
- Draft the original credit so transfer is deterministic — or issue a back-to-back. Do not hope the examination desk will repair Field 40A.
Conclusion
Article 38 is eleven lettered limbs. 38(a)–(b) are consent and the word "transferable." 38(g)–(i) are the only permitted changes and the substitution trap. Article 39 is a different act. DraftLC drafts the credit from the purchase order so "transferable" is an explicit yes or an explicit no — it does not transfer the credit after issuance.
FAQ
Does "assignable" satisfy Article 38?
No. Article 38(b) requires that the credit specifically state it is "transferable."
Must the nominated bank transfer if the credit is transferable?
No. Article 38(a): a bank is under no obligation to transfer except to the extent and in the manner expressly consented to by that bank.
Can the first beneficiary increase the amount or extend expiry on transfer?
No. Article 38(g) allows those fields to be reduced or curtailed, not increased.
What if the first beneficiary does not substitute documents on first demand?
Article 38(i): the transferring bank may present the second beneficiary's documents to the issuing bank without further responsibility to the first beneficiary.
Is assignment of proceeds the same as transfer?
No. Article 39 is proceeds only, not the right to perform, and it does not require the credit to be transferable.
Article 38(b) requires that the credit specifically state it is "transferable.
| Regulation | Article / Section | Requirement | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCP 600 | Article 38 | Transferable Credits | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
| UCP 600 | Article 39 | Assignment of Proceeds | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
← Scroll horizontally to see all columns
Quick Reference Summary
- No reference captured.
Compliance Checklist
Get the Full LC Compliance Checklist
15-point pre-submission checklist covering UCP 600, ISBP 745, and SWIFT MT700 fields. Free PDF download.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Say transferable only when you mean Article 38 — not assignment
DraftLC isolates transfer vs assignment of proceeds (Article 39) in the credit text so a middleman cannot treat them as the same act.
No credit card required · See how DraftLC drafts compliant credits