UCP 600

UCP 600 Article 25: Examining Bill of Lading Documents

📅 2026-07-13 5 min read UCP 600 / ISBP 745

Introduction

UCP 600 Article 25 addresses courier, post, and freight forwarder transport documents, but it also intersects with bill of lading examination where the credit requires both. A common examination problem is when a credit requires a bill of lading under Article 20 and a courier receipt under Article 25. The examiner must apply each article to its respective document. This guide addresses the specific intersection points where Article 25 documents are presented alongside or in relation to bills of lading, and how the examination of each document proceeds.

Failure Mode Analysis

F1: The courier receipt and bill of lading show different dispatch dates. The bill of lading shows "shipped on board" on March 1, but the courier receipt shows dispatch on March 3. Article 14(d) requires consistency. The discrepancy must be flagged.

F2: The courier receipt shows a different place of dispatch than the bill of lading. The bill of lading shows port of loading as Hamburg, but the courier receipt shows dispatch from Berlin. These are different locations. Article 14(d) requires consistency, and the credit's place-of-dispatch requirement must be satisfied under both documents.

F3: The courier receipt is presented but the credit requires a bill of lading. The credit requires a bill of lading under Article 20, but a courier receipt under Article 25 is presented instead. The document type does not match the credit. The presentation is discrepant.

F4: The courier receipt covers only part of the goods. The courier receipt shows 5 cartons dispatched, but the bill of lading covers 20 cartons. This may indicate a partial shipment. Article 31 governs partial shipments. The examiner must determine whether the partial shipment is acceptable.

F5: The courier receipt shows "taken in charge" but the bill of lading shows "not yet shipped." These are conflicting statuses. Article 14(d) requires consistency. The discrepancy must be flagged.

F6: The courier receipt does not authenticate the issuer. The bill of lading is properly authenticated, but the courier receipt is not. Each document is examined independently. Article 25(a) requires authentication. The courier receipt is discrepant even if the bill of lading is conforming.

F7: The courier receipt shows a different goods description than the bill of lading. The bill of lading says "100 units of machinery" but the courier receipt says "100 units of parts." Article 14(d) requires consistency. The discrepancy must be flagged.

Deterministic Resolution Architecture

  1. Identify the applicable articles. Determine which UCP article governs each document. The bill of lading falls under Article 20. The courier receipt falls under Article 25. Each is examined independently.

  2. Examine the bill of lading. Apply Article 20 requirements: issuer, "on board" notation, port of loading and discharge, original status.

  3. Examine the courier receipt. Apply Article 25 requirements: issuer, dispatch date, place of dispatch and destination, authentication.

  4. Cross-reference the documents. Compare data points between the bill of lading and courier receipt: dates, places, goods descriptions, quantities. Confirm consistency per Article 14(d).

  5. Check the credit. Confirm both documents satisfy the credit's requirements. If the credit requires a bill of lading, the courier receipt does not substitute. If the credit requires both, both must be presented.

  6. Apply ISBP 745. Use paragraph A29 for the courier receipt. Use paragraphs A26–A28 for the bill of lading. Use paragraph A12 for goods description tolerances.

  7. Record the decision. Document the article applied to each document, the data examined, and the outcome. Preserve the examination worksheets for audit.

  8. Escalate discrepancies. If a discrepancy exists in either document, prepare the discrepancy notice per Article 16. If the discrepancy is ambiguous, escalate to the issuing bank.

Conclusion

Where a credit requires both a bill of lading and a courier receipt, each document is examined under its own UCP article. The bill of lading falls under Article 20 and the courier receipt falls under Article 25. Cross-referencing the two documents under Article 14(d) ensures consistency. The examination architecture above separates the individual document examination from the cross-document consistency check.

FAQ

Can a courier receipt substitute for a bill of lading? No. Each document type satisfies a different UCP article. A credit requiring a bill of lading under Article 20 cannot be satisfied by a courier receipt under Article 25 unless the credit expressly permits this.

What if the courier receipt and bill of lading show different quantities? Article 14(d) requires consistency. A quantity discrepancy between the two documents is flagged. The examiner must determine whether the difference constitutes a discrepancy or is within the tolerance allowed by ISBP 745.

Can both documents be presented together? Yes. A credit may require both a bill of lading and a courier receipt. Each is examined under its applicable article, and cross-referenced under Article 14(d).

Is a courier receipt ever required alongside a bill of lading? Some credits require both: the bill of lading for the sea leg and the courier receipt for inland delivery. The credit's specific wording determines whether both are required.

What happens if the courier receipt is missing? If the credit requires a courier receipt and it is not presented, the presentation is discrepant. The examiner must refuse the document per Article 16.

Source Notes

All sources referenced in this article are context only — the examination steps derive from UCP 600, ISBP 745, and common practice.

Did You Know?

Article 20 requires the document to be issued by the carrier, master, or named agent, bear an "on board" or "shipped on board" notation, and name the port of loading and discharge.

Regulatory Reference Table
RegulationArticle / SectionRequirementConsequence
UCP 600Article 25Courier, Post or Proof of DespatchBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 20Bill of LadingBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 14Standard for Examination of DocumentsBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 31Partial Drawings or TransfersBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 16Discrepant Documents, Waiver and NoticeBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)

← Scroll horizontally to see all columns

Quick Reference Summary

  • No reference captured.

Compliance Checklist

0 of 7 completed

Get the Full LC Compliance Checklist

15-point pre-submission checklist covering UCP 600, ISBP 745, and SWIFT MT700 fields. Free PDF download.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DraftLC Compliance Engine

DraftLC generates compliant UCP 600 Article 25 — so you never face this failure mode.

DraftLC drafts your LC with UCP 600-compliant terms and flags conflicts during drafting — before documents reach the bank.

No credit card required · See how DraftLC drafts compliant credits