UCP 600

UCP 600 Article 39 — Assignment: Consent Requirements

📅 2026-07-13 4 min read UCP 600 / ISBP 745

Introduction

UCP 600 Article 39 addresses the assignment of proceeds under a documentary credit. Unlike a transfer under Article 38, an assignment does not transfer the credit itself — it transfers the right to receive payment. The consent requirement in Article 39 is a structural control that determines whether the assigned party can enforce the assignment against the issuing and nominated banks. This guide maps the consent mechanism, identifies failure modes, and establishes a compliance pathway.

Failure Mode Analysis

Failure Mode 1: Assignment Without Bank Consent

The most common failure is the beneficiary presenting an assignment notice without obtaining consent from the issuing or nominated bank. Article 39(a) requires consent from both. Without consent, the assignee has no enforceable right to receive payment from the bank.

Failure Mode 2: Consent from Only One Bank

Article 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. Obtaining consent from only the nominated bank is insufficient. The issuing bank's separate consent is mandatory.

Failure Mode 3: Confusing Assignment with Transfer

Parties frequently confuse assignment of proceeds with transfer of the credit under Article 38. Assignment transfers the right to payment; it does not transfer the credit, the beneficiary's obligations, or the document-presentation requirements. The assignee does not become a beneficiary.

Deterministic Resolution Architecture

  1. Identify whether the credit is transferable under Article 38 — if so, the transfer mechanism under Article 38 governs, not Article 39 assignment.
  2. Draft an assignment notice that clearly identifies the credit, the beneficiary (assignor), the assignee, the amount or percentage of proceeds assigned, and the bank(s) required to consent.
  3. Submit the assignment notice to the nominated bank and request that it forward the notice to the issuing bank for consent.
  4. Obtain written consent from both the nominated bank and the issuing bank before the assignment takes effect.
  5. Confirm that the credit permits partial shipment or partial drawing if the assignment covers less than the full credit amount under Article 39(d).
  6. Ensure the beneficiary retains all document-presentation obligations — the assignee's right to payment is conditional on the beneficiary presenting compliant documents.
  7. Document the consent chain: beneficiary request → nominated bank acknowledgment → issuing bank consent, with dates recorded.

Conclusion

Article 39 consent is binary: without consent from both the nominated bank and the issuing bank, the assignment does not bind the banks. The assignment does not change the credit, the beneficiary's obligations, or the document examination process. The assignee's right to payment is derived from the beneficiary's compliance, not from the assignment itself.

FAQ

Can the beneficiary assign proceeds without any bank's consent?
No. Article 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. An assignment without consent does not create an enforceable right against the banks.

Does an assignment transfer the credit to the assignee?
No. Article 39(c) confirms that the assignment does not transfer the credit. The assignee receives the right to receive payment, but the beneficiary retains all obligations under the credit.

Can proceeds be assigned in part?
Yes, Article 39(d) permits partial assignment, provided the credit allows partial shipment or partial drawing. The assignment cannot exceed the available credit amount.

What happens if the issuing bank refuses to consent?
The assignment does not bind the issuing bank. The assignee has no right to payment from the issuing bank. The beneficiary must either obtain consent or arrange payment through other means.

How does assignment differ from transfer under Article 38?
Transfer under Article 38 moves the credit and all its obligations to a new beneficiary. Assignment under Article 39 moves only the right to receive payment — the original beneficiary retains all obligations.

Source Notes

Did You Know?

Article 39(a) requires consent from both.

Regulatory Reference Table
RegulationArticle / SectionRequirementConsequence
UCP 600Article 39Assignment of ProceedsBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 38Transferable CreditsBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)
UCP 600Article 20Bill of LadingBinary determination (compliant/discrepant)

← Scroll horizontally to see all columns

Quick Reference Summary

  • No reference captured.

Compliance Checklist

0 of 7 completed
Bank Expectations vs Common Beneficiary Mistakes
✓ What Banks Expect✗ What Beneficiaries Often Do Wrong
Assignment Without Bank ConsentThe most common failure is the beneficiary presenting an assignment notice without obtaining cons...
Consent from Only One BankArticle 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. Obtaining consent fr...
Confusing Assignment with TransferParties frequently confuse assignment of proceeds with transfer of the credit under Article 38. A...

← Scroll horizontally to see all columns

Get the Full LC Compliance Checklist

15-point pre-submission checklist covering UCP 600, ISBP 745, and SWIFT MT700 fields. Free PDF download.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DraftLC Compliance Engine

DraftLC generates compliant UCP 600 Article 39 — Assignment — so you never face this failure mode.

DraftLC drafts your LC with UCP 600-compliant terms and flags conflicts during drafting — before documents reach the bank.

No credit card required · See how DraftLC drafts compliant credits