UCP 600 Article 39 — Assignment: Consent Requirements
Introduction
UCP 600 Article 39 addresses the assignment of proceeds under a documentary credit. Unlike a transfer under Article 38, an assignment does not transfer the credit itself — it transfers the right to receive payment. The consent requirement in Article 39 is a structural control that determines whether the assigned party can enforce the assignment against the issuing and nominated banks. This guide maps the consent mechanism, identifies failure modes, and establishes a compliance pathway.
Failure Mode Analysis
Failure Mode 1: Assignment Without Bank Consent
The most common failure is the beneficiary presenting an assignment notice without obtaining consent from the issuing or nominated bank. Article 39(a) requires consent from both. Without consent, the assignee has no enforceable right to receive payment from the bank.
Failure Mode 2: Consent from Only One Bank
Article 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. Obtaining consent from only the nominated bank is insufficient. The issuing bank's separate consent is mandatory.
Failure Mode 3: Confusing Assignment with Transfer
Parties frequently confuse assignment of proceeds with transfer of the credit under Article 38. Assignment transfers the right to payment; it does not transfer the credit, the beneficiary's obligations, or the document-presentation requirements. The assignee does not become a beneficiary.
Deterministic Resolution Architecture
- Identify whether the credit is transferable under Article 38 — if so, the transfer mechanism under Article 38 governs, not Article 39 assignment.
- Draft an assignment notice that clearly identifies the credit, the beneficiary (assignor), the assignee, the amount or percentage of proceeds assigned, and the bank(s) required to consent.
- Submit the assignment notice to the nominated bank and request that it forward the notice to the issuing bank for consent.
- Obtain written consent from both the nominated bank and the issuing bank before the assignment takes effect.
- Confirm that the credit permits partial shipment or partial drawing if the assignment covers less than the full credit amount under Article 39(d).
- Ensure the beneficiary retains all document-presentation obligations — the assignee's right to payment is conditional on the beneficiary presenting compliant documents.
- Document the consent chain: beneficiary request → nominated bank acknowledgment → issuing bank consent, with dates recorded.
Conclusion
Article 39 consent is binary: without consent from both the nominated bank and the issuing bank, the assignment does not bind the banks. The assignment does not change the credit, the beneficiary's obligations, or the document examination process. The assignee's right to payment is derived from the beneficiary's compliance, not from the assignment itself.
FAQ
Can the beneficiary assign proceeds without any bank's consent?
No. Article 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. An assignment without consent does not create an enforceable right against the banks.
Does an assignment transfer the credit to the assignee?
No. Article 39(c) confirms that the assignment does not transfer the credit. The assignee receives the right to receive payment, but the beneficiary retains all obligations under the credit.
Can proceeds be assigned in part?
Yes, Article 39(d) permits partial assignment, provided the credit allows partial shipment or partial drawing. The assignment cannot exceed the available credit amount.
What happens if the issuing bank refuses to consent?
The assignment does not bind the issuing bank. The assignee has no right to payment from the issuing bank. The beneficiary must either obtain consent or arrange payment through other means.
How does assignment differ from transfer under Article 38?
Transfer under Article 38 moves the credit and all its obligations to a new beneficiary. Assignment under Article 39 moves only the right to receive payment — the original beneficiary retains all obligations.
Source Notes
- Canonical authority: UCP 600 Article 39(a)–(d), ISBP 745 paragraphs E10–E13, URDG 758 Article 20.
- Live context: ICC Academy Certified UCP 600 Specialist materials and Commentary on UCP 600. Context only — not used as legal source.
Article 39(a) requires consent from both.
| Regulation | Article / Section | Requirement | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCP 600 | Article 39 | Assignment of Proceeds | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
| UCP 600 | Article 38 | Transferable Credits | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
| UCP 600 | Article 20 | Bill of Lading | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
← Scroll horizontally to see all columns
Quick Reference Summary
- No reference captured.
Compliance Checklist
| ✓ What Banks Expect | ✗ What Beneficiaries Often Do Wrong |
|---|---|
| Assignment Without Bank Consent | The most common failure is the beneficiary presenting an assignment notice without obtaining cons... |
| Consent from Only One Bank | Article 39(a) requires consent from the issuing bank and any nominated bank. Obtaining consent fr... |
| Confusing Assignment with Transfer | Parties frequently confuse assignment of proceeds with transfer of the credit under Article 38. A... |
← Scroll horizontally to see all columns
Get the Full LC Compliance Checklist
15-point pre-submission checklist covering UCP 600, ISBP 745, and SWIFT MT700 fields. Free PDF download.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DraftLC generates compliant UCP 600 Article 39 — Assignment — so you never face this failure mode.
DraftLC drafts your LC with UCP 600-compliant terms and flags conflicts during drafting — before documents reach the bank.
No credit card required · See how DraftLC drafts compliant credits