UCP 600 Article 39 — Assignment Notification Procedures
Introduction
The notification procedure under Article 39 of UCP 600 is the mechanism through which an assignment of proceeds becomes effective against the banks. The notification must reach the correct parties, contain the required data, and be processed within the framework established by the credit and the rules. This guide identifies the notification steps, the data elements required, and the failure modes that undermine the process.
Failure Mode Analysis
Failure Mode 1: Notice Sent to Wrong Bank
Article 39(b) requires the nominated bank to notify the issuing bank. If the beneficiary sends the notice directly to the issuing bank without routing through the nominated bank, or if the notice reaches a bank that is not the nominated bank, the notification procedure is disrupted.
Failure Mode 2: Incomplete Assignment Notice
The notice must identify the credit, the assignor, the assignee, and the amount. An incomplete notice — missing any of these elements — delays or defeats the consent process because the issuing bank cannot evaluate an assignment it cannot identify.
Failure Mode 3: Timing Failures
If the notification is sent after the credit has expired or after the nominated bank has already honored or negotiated, the assignment cannot be processed. The timing of notification must precede the bank's performance.
Deterministic Resolution Architecture
- Identify the nominated bank authorized to transfer or negotiate under the credit — this bank is the notification channel under Article 39(b).
- Prepare a written assignment notice containing: the credit number, the beneficiary (assignor) name, the assignee name and address, the amount or percentage of proceeds assigned, and the date.
- Submit the notice to the nominated bank with a request to forward it to the issuing bank.
- Confirm the nominated bank's acknowledgment of receipt and its commitment to forward the notice.
- Obtain written consent from the issuing bank — the assignment does not bind the issuing bank until this consent is received.
- Record the dates of notice submission, nominated bank acknowledgment, and issuing bank consent for the compliance file.
- If the notice is sent electronically under eUCP 2.1, ensure the electronic notice complies with Article E10 requirements and is transmitted through the credit's designated electronic platform.
Conclusion
The notification procedure under Article 39 is sequential and dependent: the beneficiary notifies the nominated bank, which notifies the issuing bank, which consents or refuses. Each step requires the correct data, the correct timing, and the correct channel. The assignee's right to payment is not established until the full chain of notification and consent is complete.
FAQ
Can the beneficiary notify the issuing bank directly?
Article 39(b) specifies the nominated bank as the notification channel. Direct notification to the issuing bank is not the prescribed procedure and may not satisfy the consent requirement.
What happens if the nominated bank refuses to forward the notice?
The nominated bank is not obligated to forward a notice. If it refuses, the beneficiary must find an alternative route or obtain the issuing bank's consent through other means, which is impractical without the nominated bank's cooperation.
Is there a deadline for sending the assignment notice?
There is no fixed deadline in Article 39, but the notice must arrive before the nominated bank has honored or negotiated. After performance, the assignment cannot retroactively bind the bank.
Does the issuing bank have a deadline to respond to the notice?
Article 39 does not specify a response deadline. However, the banks must act within the examination period under Article 14(b) once documents are presented.
Can the notice be sent by email?
Article 39 does not prescribe a format. Email is acceptable if the credit does not require a specific form. Under eUCP 2.1, electronic notices must comply with the credit's electronic presentation requirements.
Source Notes
- Canonical authority: UCP 600 Article 39(a)–(b), ISBP 745 paragraphs E10–E11, eUCP Version 2.1 Article E10.
- Live context: ICC Academy Certified UCP 600 Specialist and Commentary on UCP 600. Context only — not used as legal source.
Article 39(b) requires the nominated bank to notify the issuing bank.
| Regulation | Article / Section | Requirement | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCP 600 | Article 39 | Assignment of Proceeds | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
| UCP 600 | Article 14 | Standard for Examination of Documents | Binary determination (compliant/discrepant) |
← Scroll horizontally to see all columns
Quick Reference Summary
- No reference captured.
Compliance Checklist
| ✓ What Banks Expect | ✗ What Beneficiaries Often Do Wrong |
|---|---|
| Notice Sent to Wrong Bank | Article 39(b) requires the nominated bank to notify the issuing bank. If the beneficiary sends th... |
| Incomplete Assignment Notice | The notice must identify the credit, the assignor, the assignee, and the amount. An incomplete no... |
| Timing Failures | If the notification is sent after the credit has expired or after the nominated bank has already ... |
← Scroll horizontally to see all columns
Get the Full LC Compliance Checklist
15-point pre-submission checklist covering UCP 600, ISBP 745, and SWIFT MT700 fields. Free PDF download.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DraftLC generates compliant UCP 600 Article 39 — so you never face this failure mode.
DraftLC drafts your LC with UCP 600-compliant terms and flags conflicts during drafting — before documents reach the bank.
No credit card required · See how DraftLC drafts compliant credits